Not cleaning your makeup tools or using out-of-date products can cause serious problems. Here’s why
Buying the best makeup brushes, shelling out for the best foundation money can buy, and investing in a top-quality moisturiser is all for nothing if you’re not keeping on top of your makeup hygiene.
Not only can having dirty makeup tools and out-of-date products cause spots, blemishes and reactions to take place on the skin, in the most extreme of cases they can pose a significant threat to your health and even your sight.
We tested 467 makeup products – 96 lipsticks, 92 eyeliners, 93 mascaras, 107 lip glosses and 79 blender sponges – for bacterial and fungal contamination and found that 90% contained potentially deadly germs. Here are the results.
We found E coli and Staphylococci in used eyeliner and mascara. These bacteria can cause irritation and conjunctivitis (pink eye). Although the symptoms of conjunctivitis tend to be mild – itchy, watery eyes – in extreme cases it can lead to sight loss.
And the germs causing conjunctivitis can spread to other parts of the body, which can trigger a more serious secondary infection.
The lipsticks and lip gloss in our sample contained Staphylococci and various bacteria associated with faecal matter.
These bacteria could cause redness, swelling and inflammation of the lips, which can be treated with antibiotics or antibacterial creams. But if the germs spread to the blood or deeper tissues of the body, the infection can become life-threatening.
What’s more, some strains of Staphylococci, such as Staphylococcus aureus, have become more resistant to antibiotics. S aureus is fairly contagious and can cause skin infections, including impetigo.
The majority of makeup products we examined had between 100 and 1,000 individual bacteria – as few as 100 cells of some bacteria can cause infection – yet beauty blenders were the worst offender with an average of a million bacteria in our tests.
Previous studies have investigated microbial contamination in makeup in other countries, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Italy. They have reported high levels of disease-causing bacteria, including E coli, Salmonella, Klebsiella and Citrobacter, but little research has been conducted in the UK. Our research is the first to look at beauty blenders.
READ NEXT: How to clean beauty blenders
We found that these products are particularly susceptible to contamination as they are often left damp after use, which creates a breeding ground for harmful bacteria. Most (93%) of the beauty blenders we tested had never been cleaned, despite two-thirds (64%) of those we surveyed admitting that they’d dropped them on the floor.
This is despite the fact beauty blenders can be easily cleaned with warm, soapy water, which we explain in our how to clean beauty blenders article.
All cosmetics are made under strict conditions to control the growth and accumulation of microbes during use. Preservatives are used to stop bacteria from growing, but they have a finite shelf life. All cosmetics have expiry dates, which are calculated based on the length of time the preservatives in the product are able to control contamination.
If the expiry date is printed on the packaging, it is displayed in the form of a symbol resembling an opened pot with either 3M, 6M, 12M, 18M, 24M, or 36M printed in the middle, corresponding to the number of months the product can be used.
Most products have an expiry date of three to 12 months, providing the user has not had an infection such as conjunctivitis.
However, our latest study shows that people are using products beyond the expiry dates and allowing microbial contamination to build up.
To avoid contamination, make sure you discard makeup that has passed the expiry period, don’t apply makeup if you have an infection or broken skin, never share cosmetics with friends, and definitely avoid using makeup samples in stores.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Dr Amreen Bashir is a Lecturer in Biomedical Science at Aston University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
